Skip to content
Home » Insights » Not All Influence Wears a Badge: How to Identify the Experts Who Actually Change Behaviour

Not All Influence Wears a Badge: How to Identify the Experts Who Actually Change Behaviour

Change Concept Square

For years, companies have turned to the same names when building advocacy programmes. Familiar, respected, easy to invite onto a podium. Yet influence today is not defined by conference visibility alone. It is dynamic, digital, and increasingly decentralised.

The challenge for companies is clear: how do you separate visibility from true influence?

Why the “Usual Suspects” Are Not Enough

In ophthalmology and beyond, the podium remains powerful — but it is only one channel. Senior leaders continue to shape opinion, yet decision-making today is also informed by a wider ecosystem. Regional experts influencing local practice, clinicians active across digital platforms, and cross-disciplinary voices connecting science to everyday care all play a part in how new approaches are understood and adopted.

Over-reliance on the same familiar experts risks:

  • Narrow perspectives that miss emerging trends
  • Audiences disengaging from repeated voices
  • Lost opportunities to connect with the clinicians who are actually driving adoption at ground level

Influence Is More Than Reputation

True influence is about behaviour change, not visibility. The most impactful experts are those who:

  • Shape how peers interpret and act on data
  • Translate evidence into practical clinical decisions
  • Build trust in new products or approaches
  • Sustain conversations across platforms and over time

These are the voices who shift markets — often without wearing a badge or standing at a podium.

How Companies Can Get It Right

Identifying and engaging the right experts requires a structured, objective approach:

  1. Map the landscape — Go beyond publication counts and podium slots. Analyse networks, channels, and the types of conversations that actually move practice.
  2. Vet strategically — Influence can be positive or negative. Due diligence ensures alignment, credibility, and compliance.
  3. Balance global and local voices — True reach comes from combining recognised leaders with regional drivers of behaviour.
  4. Support, don’t just select — The most effective partnerships are reciprocal. Companies that equip experts with the right tools and platforms see stronger, longer-lasting impact.

Why This Matters

In a world where trust in science cannot be assumed, credibility comes not from how loudly a message is delivered but from who carries it and how it is received. Companies that mistake visibility for influence risk investing heavily with limited return. Those who identify, support, and represent the right voices unlock advocacy that is credible, collaborative, and commercially effective.

At ArtiaCo., we specialise in helping companies identify, vet, and represent the experts who truly influence behaviour — whether they stand on the podium or not. If your advocacy programmes are built around the “usual suspects,” it may be time to rethink. Get in touch to see how we can help.

Bernie Ursell - With 25+ years in medical communications — including senior roles at ZEISS, AbbVie and Allergan — Bernie offers deep experience in messaging, compliance and international healthcare strategy. She’s helped shape the narratives behind some of the biggest names in eye care and knows how to elevate expert voices with clarity and credibility.